AMZCHEF Cold Press Juicer — 6.5 In Self-Feeding Chute, 3-in-1

AMZCHEF Cold Press Juicer Review: Does a 6.5-Inch Chute Solve the Real Problem?

Most juicers are abandoned within a year, and it is almost never the juice that kills them. It is the preparation: quartering apples, coring pears, feeding celery through a two-inch tube one stalk at a time, and then washing five components with a brush. Twenty minutes of work for a glass of juice is a hobby, not a habit.

The wide-chute masticating juicer exists to attack the first half of that problem. AMZCHEF’s self-feeding model takes a 6.5-inch opening and drops whole apples in without any knife work at all. Ninja does the same thing at a higher price and with a bigger name. The question is whether removing the chopping is enough to make a juicer stick.

Quick verdict: the AMZCHEF cold press juicer scores 8.0/10 in this SoftPickr review. The wide chute genuinely removes the most tedious part of juicing, but the cleaning that ends most juicing habits is still here, and the listing cannot agree with itself about which model you are buying.

Key Specifications

What a 6.5-Inch Chute Actually Removes

A conventional masticating juicer has a chute around two to three inches across, which means every apple gets quartered, every beetroot gets halved, and celery goes in one stalk at a time. That preparation is not difficult; it is simply the reason the juicer stays in the cupboard. Making juice becomes a ten-minute job before the machine is even switched on.

Six and a half inches takes a whole apple. It takes a whole tomato, a pear, a peeled orange, and a fistful of celery at once. The self-feeding design means gravity does the pushing rather than you standing over it with a plunger. The realistic saving is five to eight minutes per session, which does not sound like much until it is the difference between juicing three times a week and three times a year.

Cold Press Versus Centrifugal, Honestly

A masticating juicer crushes and presses at low speed rather than shredding at high speed. The practical results are real but modest: slightly higher yield from leafy greens and celery, noticeably less foam, and juice that separates more slowly in the fridge. Less heat and aeration during extraction means the juice keeps better, typically a day or two rather than hours.

What it is not is a nutritional transformation. The claims made for cold pressing in marketing copy run well ahead of what anyone has demonstrated, and a centrifugal juicer at half the price produces perfectly good juice from hard fruit. Choose masticating for greens, for yield, and for juice you want to make in the evening and drink in the morning. Do not choose it because of a health claim.

The Sorbet Filter Is Not a Gimmick

Swapping the fine filter for the blank sorbet filter turns the auger into a press with nowhere for liquid to escape, so frozen fruit comes out as a smooth extruded ribbon rather than juice. Frozen bananas produce something genuinely close to soft-serve with no dairy, no sugar and no ice crystals, in about ninety seconds.

This matters because it is the function most likely to keep the machine on the counter. A juicer used for juice alone is a single-purpose appliance competing for space; one that also makes a child’s dessert from frozen mango gets used twice as often. The nut milk function is real too, though a nut milk bag costs five dollars and does the same job.

600 Watts, Two Speeds and Where It Struggles

Six hundred watts is on the strong side for a home masticating juicer, and the two-speed control is more useful than it first appears: soft speed for citrus and soft fruit, hard speed for carrots, beetroot and apples. The motor does not bog down on hard produce, which is where cheaper slow juicers audibly labour.

Fibrous greens are still the weak point of the whole category and this machine is no exception. Celery and kale are the reason anti-clogging designs exist, and long fibres will eventually wrap the auger regardless of what the marketing says. The fix is old and unglamorous: chop stringy greens into two-inch lengths before they go in, and alternate them with something hard like apple to keep the auger clearing.

Limitations and Compromises

The listing does not agree with itself about what it is selling. The model name field reads ZM1939 while the model number and part number both read ZM1919. On a product where filters, augers and containers are model-specific, that matters directly: ordering a replacement screen against the wrong number gets you a part that does not fit. Note the number printed on the machine you receive and order spares against that rather than against the listing.

Cleaning is still the thing that will decide whether you keep using it, and the wide chute does not help here at all. There are five components to rinse and a filter screen that needs a brush every time, because dried pulp in a fine mesh becomes cement. The listing says removable parts are dishwasher safe; the fine filter is the part you should still do by hand, since dishwasher heat and detergent shorten the life of fine mesh screens.

Two smaller specification problems are worth flagging. The power source is recorded as “dc” alongside a voltage of 120 V, which is an AC supply. And capacity is given as 6.3 pounds in one field while the product highlight claims 90 ounces, which is 5.6 pounds — two different figures for the same thing in the same listing. Neither changes the machine, but both are reasons to verify rather than assume.

Cleaning, Filter Care and Pulp Management

Rinse immediately, every time, without exception. Pulp that has dried in a fine mesh filter takes ten minutes and a stiff brush; pulp rinsed within two minutes of finishing takes thirty seconds under a tap. This single habit is the difference between a juicer that stays on the counter and one that migrates to a cupboard. Run a jug of water through the machine while it is still running to flush the auger housing before disassembly.

Hand wash the fine filter with the supplied brush rather than putting it in the dishwasher, whatever the listing says, since heat and detergent degrade fine mesh over time. If the filter starts looking discoloured from carrot or beetroot, soak it in a solution of water and a spoon of bicarbonate of soda rather than scrubbing harder. Dry all parts fully before reassembling, and store the machine assembled so nothing goes missing.

Who Should Buy It?

• You have abandoned a juicer before because of the chopping.
• You juice leafy greens and celery where yield actually differs.
• You want juice tonight that is still good tomorrow morning.
• The sorbet function appeals as much as the juice does.
• You want a wide-chute cold press without paying Ninja money.

Look elsewhere if you mainly juice hard fruit like apples and carrots, where a centrifugal juicer at half the price is faster and the yield difference is small. Look elsewhere too if you will not commit to rinsing immediately after every use, because no design solves that, and if brand support matters to you, the Ninja NeverClog costs about thirty dollars more with a name behind it.

SoftPickr Verdict

The AMZCHEF cold press juicer earns 8.0/10. It solves the right problem. The 6.5-inch self-feeding chute removes the preparation that kills most juicing habits, the 600 W motor handles hard produce without labouring, and the sorbet filter gives the machine a second reason to stay on the counter. At around a hundred dollars on offer it undercuts the obvious alternative meaningfully.

The compromise is that it only solves half the problem, and the half it leaves is the one that matters more over a year. You still wash five parts and brush a mesh filter after every glass. Buy it if you will do that. If you know you will not, no juicer at any price will change the outcome.

Price and availability change frequently on Amazon, and prices shown here may be out of date — check the current listing before ordering.

AMZCHEF cold press juicer — Frequently Asked Questions

Does a whole apple really fit in the chute?

Yes, that is the entire point of the design. The 6.5-inch self-feeding opening takes whole apples, tomatoes, pears and peeled oranges without any knife work, and gravity feeds them rather than you pushing with a plunger. The realistic saving is five to eight minutes of preparation per session, which is what determines whether a juicer stays in use.

Is cold pressed juice actually better than centrifugal?

Modestly, and mainly for leafy greens. You get slightly higher yield from celery and kale, much less foam, and juice that separates more slowly so it keeps a day or two rather than hours. For hard fruit like apples and carrots the difference is small. The broader health claims made for cold pressing run well ahead of the evidence.

Which model number should I order spares against?

Whichever one is printed on the machine you actually receive. The listing gives the model name as ZM1939 and the model and part numbers as ZM1919, and filters and augers are model-specific. Ordering a replacement screen against the wrong number will get you a part that does not fit, so check the unit rather than the page.

How long does cleaning take in practice?

About two minutes if you rinse straight away and around ten if you leave it. Five components come apart, and the fine mesh filter needs the supplied brush every time because dried pulp sets hard in mesh. Flushing a jug of water through while the machine is still running before disassembly cuts the job roughly in half.

Ready to buy? You can check the current price of the AMZCHEF cold press juicer on Amazon — the listing shows live pricing and current stock, both of which move around more than the specification does. SoftPickr earns a commission on qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

Related Reviews

If the AMZCHEF cold press juicer is not quite the right fit, these SoftPickr reviews cover the closest alternatives we have tested:

• Ninja Professional Blender BL610 Review
• KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender Review
• Hamilton Beach Stack and Snap Food Processor Review